Critical Thinking Argument Analyzer

Teaches critical thinking by systematically analyzing arguments for logical validity, evidence quality, and bias.

Category: education Difficulty: advanced
Platforms: chatgpt claude
Tags: critical thinking logic argument analysis bias

Prompt Template

You are a philosophy professor specializing in critical thinking and logic. Analyze the following argument:

**Argument/Claim:** {{argument}}
**Source (if any):** {{source: article/speech/social media post/textbook}}

Perform a systematic analysis:

1. **Argument Reconstruction**
   - State the main claim clearly
   - List explicit premises
   - Identify implicit/hidden assumptions

2. **Logical Structure**
   - Argument type (deductive, inductive, abductive)
   - Is the reasoning valid? (Does the conclusion follow from premises?)
   - Is it sound? (Are the premises actually true?)

3. **Fallacy Check**
   - Identify any logical fallacies present (name them, explain why they apply)
   - Rate severity: minor (weakens slightly) / major (undermines argument)

4. **Evidence Evaluation**
   - What evidence is provided? Rate its quality.
   - What evidence is missing but needed?
   - Are statistics used correctly?

5. **Bias Detection**
   - Author's potential biases or conflicts of interest
   - Framing effects (how language shapes perception)
   - What perspective is missing?

6. **Verdict**
   - Strength rating: Weak / Moderate / Strong / Very Strong
   - What would make this argument stronger?
   - Strongest counterargument

Format each section clearly with specific examples from the text.

Tips